4.6 Article

Modal and polarization qubits in Ti:LiNbO3 photonic circuits for a universal quantum logic gate

期刊

OPTICS EXPRESS
卷 18, 期 19, 页码 20475-20490

出版社

OPTICAL SOC AMER
DOI: 10.1364/OE.18.020475

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. Bernard M. Gordon Center for Subsurface Sensing and Imaging Systems (CenSSIS), NSF Engineering Research Center
  2. U.S. Army Research Office (ARO) Multidisciplinary University Research Initiative (MURI)
  3. Boston University Photonics Center

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Lithium niobate photonic circuits have the salutary property of permitting the generation, transmission, and processing of photons to be accommodated on a single chip. Compact photonic circuits such as these, with multiple components integrated on a single chip, are crucial for efficiently implementing quantum information processing schemes. We present a set of basic transformations that are useful for manipulating modal qubits in Ti:LiNbO3 photonic quantum circuits. These include the mode analyzer, a device that separates the even and odd components of a state into two separate spatial paths; the mode rotator, which rotates the state by an angle in mode space; and modal Pauli spin operators that effect related operations. We also describe the design of a deterministic, two-qubit, single-photon, CNOT gate, a key element in certain sets of universal quantum logic gates. It is implemented as a Ti: LiNbO3 photonic quantum circuit in which the polarization and mode number of a single photon serve as the control and target qubits, respectively. It is shown that the effects of dispersion in the CNOT circuit can be mitigated by augmenting it with an additional path. The performance of all of these components are confirmed by numerical simulations. The implementation of these transformations relies on selective and controllable power coupling among single-and two-mode waveguides, as well as the polarization sensitivity of the Pockels coefficients in LiNbO3. (C) 2010 Optical Society of America

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据