4.6 Article

Corneal Confocal Microscopy in Patients with Vernal Keratoconjunctivitis

期刊

OPHTHALMOLOGY
卷 119, 期 3, 页码 509-515

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.09.018

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: To compare corneal morphologic features using in vivo confocal microscopy in vernal keratoconjunctivitis (VKC) patients compared with normal subjects. Design: Prospective, comparative study. Participants: Thirty-two VKC patients (26 males, 6 females; mean age, 17.1 years) and 40 normal subjects (20 males, 20 females; mean age, 19.3 years) were included. Methods: All subjects underwent a full ophthalmologic examination. Confoscan CS4 (Nidek, Gamagori, Japan) images of the central cornea were obtained with a X40 noncontact lens and Z-ring device. Main Outcome Measures: The superficial and basal epithelium, subbasal nerve plexus, anterior stroma, stromal nerves, and endothelium of the central cornea were studied. Results: The VKC patients had increased diameter, reflectivity, and presence of nuclear activation of superficial epithelial cells; reduced density of the basal membrane; lower density of keratocytes, increased presence of activated keratocytes, and inflammatory cells in the anterior stroma; and lower density and number of fibers, lower number of beadings, and higher grade of tortuosity of fibers in the subbasal nerve plexus. Increased alterations in thickness, deflections, and tortuosity were observed in stromal corneal nerves. An increased number of inflammatory cells in close proximity to the subbasal and stromal nerve fibers also was observed in VKC subjects. Conclusions: Corneal involvement in VKC is associated with alterations of the epithelium and subbasal and stromal corneal nerves. These changes may relate to the tear dysfunction and nonspecific hyperreactivity typical of these patients. Corneal confocal microscopy is a useful tool for studying in vivo pathologic corneal changes in VKC. Financial Disclosure(s): The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article. Ophthalmology 2012;119:509-515 (C) 2012 by the American Academy of Ophthalmology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据