4.6 Article

Antibiotic Resistance of Conjunctiva and Nasopharynx Evaluation Study: A Prospective Study of Patients Undergoing Intravitreal Injections

期刊

OPHTHALMOLOGY
卷 117, 期 12, 页码 2372-2378

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.03.034

关键词

-

资金

  1. Research to Prevent Blindness

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: To determine the baseline antibiotic susceptibility patterns of conjunctival and nasopharyngeal flora isolated from patients undergoing intravitreal (IVT) injections for choroidal neovascularization (CNV). Design: Prospective, observational study. Participants: Forty-eight eyes of 24 patients undergoing unilateral IVT injections for CNV. Methods: Bilateral conjunctival and unilateral nasopharyngeal cultures on the treatment side were taken before application of any topical medications. Main Outcome Measures: Bacterial isolates were identified and tested for antibiotic susceptibility to 16 different antibiotics using the Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion technique. Results: A total of 57 bacterial isolates were obtained from the conjunctiva of 48 eyes. Coagulase-negative staphylococci (CNS) accounted for 37 of the 57 isolates (65%). The most common CNS organisms were Staphylococcus epidermidis and Staphylococcus lugdunensis accounting for 73% and 11% of CNS isolates, respectively. More than half of S. epidermidis isolates demonstrated some level of resistance to ofloxacin and levofloxacin, and 33% and 37% of isolates showed some level of resistance against gatifloxacin and moxifloxacin, respectively. Some 60% and 30% of CNS isolates were resistant to >= 3 and >= 5 antibiotics, respectively. Among the 24 nasopharyngeal cultures, 8 (33%) grew Staphylococcus aureus, and 1 of the 8 isolates (13%) was resistant to all penicillin, cephalosporin, macrolide, and fluoroquinolone antibiotics tested. Conclusions: Our results demonstrate subtantial levels of resistance to third-and fourth-generation fluoroquinolones and multiresistance among ocular CNS isolated from patients undergoing IVT injections for CNV.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据