4.4 Article

Regio and diastereoselective multicomponent 1,3-dipolar cycloadditions between prolinate hydrochlorides, aldehydes and dipolarophiles for the direct synthesis of pyrrolizidines

期刊

TETRAHEDRON
卷 71, 期 52, 页码 9645-9661

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.tet.2015.10.064

关键词

Multicomponent; Cycloaddition; Azomethine ylide; Pyrrolizidines; Prolines

资金

  1. Spanish Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion (MICINN) [CTQ2010-20387, CSD2007-00006]
  2. Spanish Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad (MINECO) [CTQ2013-43446-P, CTQ2014-51912-REDC]
  3. FEDER
  4. Generalitat Valenciana [PROMETEO 2009/039, PROMETEOII/2014/017]
  5. University of Alicante
  6. Spanish Government

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A general synthesis of highly substituted pyrrolizidines can be performed by a multicomponent 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition using proline ester hydrochlorides, aldehydes and dipolarophiles, at room temperature without catalysts or in the presence of AgOAc (5 mol %). In the case of (2S,4R)-4-hydroxyproline derivatives it is possible to obtain enantioenriched pyrrolizidines with high control of the regio- and diastereoselectivity affording the adducts 2,4-trans-2,5-trans according to an endo-approach and a S-dipole geometry of the in situ generated azomethine ylide. For proline esters a similar regioselectivity and endo-diastereoselectivity are observed when the dipole promotes an a-attack. However, when ethyl glyoxylate is used as aldehyde component the gamma-attack of the S-ylide takes place preferentially giving rise the opposite regioselectivity for acrylic dipolarophiles, being crucial the role of silver acetate. In this case, the exo-adducts with a 2,3-cis-2,5-trans relative configuration are diastereoselectively obtained. In addition, computational studies have also been carried out to shed light on the origins of the diastereo- and regioselectivity observed for the described 1,3-dipolar cycloadditions. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据