4.5 Article

Post- transcriptional repression of FOXO1 by QKI results in low levels of FOXO1 expression in breast cancer cells

期刊

ONCOLOGY REPORTS
卷 31, 期 3, 页码 1459-1465

出版社

SPANDIDOS PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.3892/or.2013.2957

关键词

Quaking; FOXO1; ATRA; post-transcriptional regulation

类别

资金

  1. National Science Fund of China [NSF: 31000520, NSF: 30470387, NSF: 30570396, NSF: C030200303]
  2. Program for Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team in the University [IRT0459]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The RNA-binding protein Quaking (QKI) is known to be essential for embryonic development and postnatal myelination. Forkhead box O1 (FOXO1) is a critical tumor suppressor for cell proliferation control. Dysregulation of FOXO1 expression has been observed in a variety of cancers. In the present study, we demonstrated that QKI decreased FOXO1 mRNA expression at the post-transcriptional level. QKI was able to bind the 3UTR of FOXO1 mRNA directly and decreased its mRNA stability. To determine whether QKI-mediated post-transcriptional repression of FOXO1 indeed plays a role in cancer cells, we first detected both QKI and FOXO1 expression in four breast cancer cell lines. FOXO1 expression was extremely low in these cell lines, whereas QKI expression was relative high. Knockdown of QKI significantly restored FOXO1 expression. ATRA, an inducer of apoptosis or differentiation, dramatically enhanced FOXO1 expression while it repressed QKI expression. Importantly, the ATRA-induced increase in FOXO1 expression was dependent on QKI-mediated post-transcriptional regulation. Consistently, 5-FU, a widely used chemotherapeutic agent, increased FOXO1 expression via inhibition of QKI. In summary, our study provides initial evidence demonstrating that QKI-mediated repression of FOXO1 may be one of the factors contributing to the oncogenesis and progression of breast carcinoma, which suggests that targeting QKI may serve as a novel strategy to sensitize breast cancers to chemotherapy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据