4.5 Article

Death receptor 5-mediated TNFR family signaling pathways modulate γ-humulene-induced apoptosis in human colorectal cancer HT29 cells

期刊

ONCOLOGY REPORTS
卷 25, 期 2, 页码 419-424

出版社

SPANDIDOS PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.3892/or.2010.1087

关键词

gamma-humulene; herbal medicine; TNFR family apoptotic signaling; death receptor 5; human colorectal cancer HT29 cells

类别

资金

  1. National Science Council of the Republic of China [95-2320-B-039-049-MY2, NSC 97-2320-B-039-020-MY3]
  2. China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan [CMU97-184]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A component from Emilia sonchifolia (L.) DC, gamma-humulene, was investigated. Significantly decreased cell viability of human colorectal cancer HT29 cells in a dose-dependent manner with IC50 53.67 +/- 2.99 mu M for 24-h treatment was found. gamma-Humulene induced apoptotic cell death and apoptosis was confirmed by morphological assessment. The staining with propidium iodide (PI) and flow cytometric analysis also showed that gamma-humulene significantly promoted the sub-G1 phase (an apoptotic population) in HT29 cells. Colorimetric assays indicated that pretreatment with a specific inhibitor of caspase-8 (Z-IETD-FMK) significantly reduced activities of caspase-8 and caspase-3 in examined HT29 cells. gamma-Humulene stimulated the death receptor 5 (DR5), DR4, Fas-associated protein with death domain (FADD), the cleavage of caspase-8 and cleavage caspase-3, but reduced the protein levels of cellular Fas-associated death-domain-like IL-1 beta-converting enzyme inhibitory protein (c-FLIP) by Western blot analysis. Consequently, gamma-humulene-triggered cell death was significantly attenuated by DR5 siRNA and the caspase-8 inhibitor. Based on our results, we suggest that gamma-humulene induced apoptotic cell death in HT29 cells through a DR5-mediated caspase-8 and -3-dependent signaling pathway. Therefore, this agent might be useful for developing new therapeutic regimens for treatment of colorectal cancer in the future.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据