4.7 Article

Neoadjuvant Therapy of Pancreatic Cancer: The Emerging Paradigm?

期刊

ONCOLOGIST
卷 17, 期 2, 页码 192-200

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2011-0268

关键词

Pancreatic cancer; Neoadjuvant; Borderline resectable chemotherapy; Borderline resectable; Chemoradiation

类别

资金

  1. Novartis Oncology
  2. Pfizer
  3. Myriad
  4. Enzon
  5. Amgen
  6. Bayer
  7. Genentech
  8. sanofi-aventis
  9. AstraZeneca
  10. Methylgene
  11. Ardea
  12. Exelixis
  13. FibroGen
  14. Incyte
  15. ArQule
  16. GlaxoSmithKline
  17. Bristol-Myers Squibb

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Pancreatic cancer remains one of the deadliest cancers due to difficulty in early diagnosis and its high resistance to chemotherapy and radiation. It is now clear that even patients with potentially resectable disease require multimodality treatment including chemotherapy and/or radiation to improve resectability and reduce recurrence. Tremendous efforts are currently being invested in refining preoperative staging to identify optimal surgical candidates, and also in developing various neoadjuvant or adjuvant regimens to improve surgical outcome. Although at present no studies have been done to directly compare the benefit of neoadjuvant versus adjuvant approaches, accumulating evidence suggests that the neoadjuvant approach is probably beneficial for a subset of the patient population, particularly those with borderline resectable disease in which complete surgical resection is almost certainly unachievable. In this article, we review the literature and rationales of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and chemoradiation, as well as their potential limitations and caveats. We also review the pathological findings following neoadjuvant therapies, and potential surgical complications that may be associated with neoadjuvant therapies. The Oncologist 2012;17:192-200

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据