4.8 Article

The transcriptional co-activator SND1 is a novel regulator of alternative splicing in prostate cancer cells

期刊

ONCOGENE
卷 33, 期 29, 页码 3794-3802

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/onc.2013.360

关键词

alternative splicing; SND1; SAM68; CD44; prostate cancer

资金

  1. Association for International Cancer Research (AICR) [12-0150]
  2. Associazione Italiana Ricerca sul Cancro (AIRC) [10348]
  3. Associazione Italiana Ricerca sul Cancro (MFAG) [11658]
  4. Worldwide Cancer Research [12-0150] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Splicing abnormalities have profound impact in human cancer. Several splicing factors, including SAM68, have pro-oncogenic functions, and their increased expression often correlates with human cancer development and progression. Herein, we have identified using mass spectrometry proteins that interact with endogenous SAM68 in prostate cancer (PCa) cells. Among other interesting proteins, we have characterized the interaction of SAM68 with SND1, a transcriptional co-activator that binds spliceosome components, thus coupling transcription and splicing. We found that both SAM68 and SND1 are upregulated in PCa cells with respect to benign prostate cells. Upregulation of SND1 exerts a synergic effect with SAM68 on exon v5 inclusion in the CD44 mRNA. The effect of SND1 on CD44 splicing required SAM68, as it was compromised after knockdown of this protein or mutation of the SAM68-binding sites in the CD44 pre-mRNA. More generally, we found that SND1 promotes the inclusion of CD44 variable exons by recruiting SAM68 and spliceosomal components on CD44 pre-mRNA. Inclusion of the variable exons in CD44 correlates with increased proliferation, motility and invasiveness of cancer cells. Strikingly, we found that knockdown of SND1, or SAM68, reduced proliferation and migration of PCa cells. Thus, our findings strongly suggest that SND1 is a novel regulator of alternative splicing that promotes PCa cell growth and survival.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据