4.8 Article

A Notch1-neuregulin1 autocrine signaling loop contributes to melanoma growth

期刊

ONCOGENE
卷 31, 期 43, 页码 4609-4618

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/onc.2011.606

关键词

NIC: Notch1 intracellular domain; Notch1-TM: transmembrane Notch1; NRG1: neuregulin1; ERBB: erythroblastic leukemia viral oncogene homolog or EGF (epidermal growth factor) family of transmembrane receptor tyrosine kinases; p27KIP1: CDKN1B: cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 1B

资金

  1. American Cancer Society [ACS-IRG-91-022, ACS-RSG-11-139-01-DDC]
  2. National Institute of Health [P30CA147877]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Notch pathway is an evolutionary conserved signaling cascade that has an essential role in melanoblast and melanocyte stem cell homeostasis. Notch signaling is emerging as a key player in melanoma, the most deadly form of skin cancer. In melanoma, Notch1 is inappropriately reactivated and contributes to melanoma tumorigenicity. Here, we propose a novel mechanism by which Notch1 promotes the disease. We found that Notch1 directly regulates the transcription of neuregulin1 (NRG1) by binding to its promoter region. NRG1 is the ligand for ERBB3 and 4, members of the epidermal growth factor family of receptors that are involved in the genesis and progression of a number of cancers. Notch1 and NRG1 expression are associated in melanoma and inhibition of NRG1 signaling leads to melanoma cell growth inhibition and tumor growth delay. Mechanistically, these effects are associated with the inhibition of the PI3Kinase/Akt signaling pathway and with the accumulation of p27Kip1. On the other end, addition of recombinant NRG1 can partially restore melanoma cell growth that is inhibited by Notch1 ablation. Taken together, our findings underline a new, previously undescribed autocrine signaling loop between Notch1 and NRG1 that controls melanoma growth and provide experimental evidence that the targeting of Notch and ERBB signaling may represent a novel potential therapeutic approach in melanoma.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据