4.4 Article

Effects of Sleeve Gastrectomy and Medical Treatment for Obesity on Glucagon-like Peptide 1 Levels and Glucose Homeostasis in Non-diabetic Subjects

期刊

OBESITY SURGERY
卷 21, 期 7, 页码 902-909

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11695-011-0375-4

关键词

Glucagon-like peptide 1; Sleeve gastrectomy; Diet; Insulin-resistance; Obesity; Weight loss; Insulin secretion; Surgery for obesity

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The effects of medical and surgical treatments for obesity on glucose metabolism and glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) levels independent of weight loss remain unclear. This study aims to assess plasma glucose levels, insulin sensitivity and secretion, and GLP-1 levels before and after sleeve gastrectomy (SG) or medical treatment (MED) for obesity. This study is a prospective, controlled, non-randomised study. Two groups of non-diabetic obese patients with similar BMIs, including a SG group (BMI, 35.5 +/- 0.9 kg/m(2); n = 6) and a MED group (BMI, 37.7 +/- 1.9 kg/m(2); n = 6) and a group of lean subjects (BMI, 21.7 +/- 0.7 kg/m(2); n = 8). Plasma glucose, insulin, and total GLP-1 levels at fasting and after the intake of a standard liquid meal at baseline and at 2 months post-intervention. At baseline, total GLP-1 levels were similar, but obese patients had lower insulin sensitivity and higher insulin secretion than lean subjects. At 2 months post-intervention, SG and MED patients achieved similar weight loss (14.4 +/- 0.8%, 15.3 +/- 0.9%, respectively). Insulin sensitivity increased in SG and MED patients; however, postprandial insulin secretion decreased after MED, but not after SG. The incremental area under the curve of GLP-1 increased after SG (P = 0.04), but not after MED. Weight loss by medical or surgical treatment improved insulin sensitivity. However, only MED corrected the hyperinsulinemic postprandial state associated to obesity. Postprandial GLP-1 levels increased significantly after SG without duodenal exclusion, which may explain why insulin secretion did not decrease following this surgery.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据