4.4 Article

Natural Orifice Surgery: Endoluminal Pouch Reduction Following Failed Vertical Banded Gastroplasty

期刊

OBESITY SURGERY
卷 21, 期 11, 页码 1787-1791

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11695-011-0442-x

关键词

StomaphyX (TM); Morbid obesity; Bariatric surgery; Flexible endoscopy; Revisional surgery; Vertical banded gastroplasty

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Following vertical banded gastroplasty (VBG), patients may develop pouch complications such as dilation and staple-line dehiscence. This may contribute to weight regain, and if conservative measures are exhausted, traditionally, open revisional surgery of the pouch or conversion of the VBG to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) would be considered. StomaphyX(TM) is an endoscopic device used with a conventional gastroscope for the approximation of tissue in gastric pouches or across gastroenteric anastomoses to enhance restriction. The objective of this study is to analyze the outcomes of StomaphyX(TM) endoluminal pouch revision following failed VBG. Patients with weight gain following VBG had endoluminal pouch reduction performed using the StomaphyX(TM) device in revisional bariatric surgery clinic, tertiary care hospital, Canada. Pre- and postoperative weights were compared, and a regression model was developed to examine for predictors of weight loss following StomaphyX(TM). Fourteen patients were included in the study. Patients had a mean age of 47.3 +/- 7.9 years, and 13 of 14 were female. Significant reductions were appreciated between pre- and postoperative weight and BMI (119.5 +/- 25.9 kg vs. 109.6 +/- 24.4 kg; 43.4 +/- 9.7 kg/m(2) vs. 39.8 +/- 9.1 kg/m(2), respectively). There was no correlation between preoperative pouch status and weight loss. Three patients had two separate StomaphyX(TM) procedures performed. Only minor complications (headache, back pain) were identified. The StomaphyX(TM) device may be safely used for reduction of pouch size in patients following VBG. Further studies are required to determine the role of StomaphyX(TM) endoluminal pouch reduction in comparison to open or laparoscopic revisional surgery.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据