4.3 Article

Developmental ORIgins of Healthy and Unhealthy AgeiNg: The Role of Maternal Obesity - Introduction to DORIAN

期刊

OBESITY FACTS
卷 7, 期 2, 页码 130-151

出版社

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000362656

关键词

Pregnancy; Foetal programming; Obesity; Diabetes; Cardiovascular disease; Stress; Oxidative damage; Insulin resistance; HSD2; p66

资金

  1. EU (FP7)
  2. Italian Ministry of Health (Italia-Usa Project) [11US/14/1]
  3. European Foundation for the Study of Diabetes (EFSD) [2009]
  4. [278603]
  5. Medical Research Council [MR/K026992/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Europe has the highest proportion of elderly people in the world. Cardiovascular disease, type 2 diabetes, sarcopenia and cognitive decline frequently coexist in the same aged individual, sharing common early risk factors and being mutually reinforcing. Among conditions which may contribute to establish early risk factors, this review focuses on maternal obesity, since the epidemic of obesity involves an ever growing number of women of reproductive age and children, calling for appropriate studies to understand the consequences of maternal obesity on the offspring's health and for developing effective measures and policies to improve people's health before their conception and birth. Though the current knowledge suggests that the long-term impact of maternal obesity on the offspring's health may be substantial, the outcomes of maternal obesity over the lifespan have not been quantified, and the molecular changes induced by maternal obesity remain poorly characterized. We hypothesize that maternal insulin resistance and reduced placental glucocorticoid catabolism, leading to oxidative stress, may damage the DNA, either in its structure (telomere shortening) or in its function (via epigenetic changes), resulting in altered gene expression/repair, disease during life, and pathological ageing. This review illustrates the background to the EU-FP7-HEALTH-DORIAN project. (C) 2014 S. Karger GmbH, Freiburg

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据