期刊
OBESITY
卷 23, 期 3, 页码 507-511出版社
WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/oby.20951
关键词
-
资金
- National Institutes of Health [U01DK094418, R01DK099175, 1U54GM104940, 2P30DK072476]
ObjectiveThere is an urgent need to adopt standardized nomenclature as it relates to gestational weight gain (GWG), a more uniform approach to calculate it, and hence quantifying adherence to the 2009 Institute of Medicine (IOM) guidelines. MethodsThis perspective highlights the varying methods used to estimate GWG and discuss the advantages and limitations of each. ResultsWhile these calculations could be argued to have a minimal impact on data at the population level, on the patient level, incorrectly estimating weight at conception can result in misclassification of preconception body mass index (BMI) and assignment of the IOM guidelines which inherently affect the prospective management of weight gain (and potential outcomes) during the current pregnancy. ConclusionsThis study recommends that preconception BMI and total GWG be determined objectively and total GWG be adjusted for length of gestation before assessing adherence to the IOM GWG guidelines.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据