4.4 Article

Supplementation of complex milk lipid concentrate (CMLc) improved the memory of aged rats

期刊

NUTRITIONAL NEUROSCIENCE
卷 18, 期 1, 页码 22-29

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1179/1476830513Y.0000000096

关键词

Phospholipids; Supplementation; Memory; Morris water maze tests; Dopamine; vascular degeneration; Aged rats

资金

  1. Dairy Primary Growth Partnership
  2. Minister of Business, Innovation and Employment
  3. Fonterra Co-operative Group Ltd, New Zealand

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives: The socio-economic impact from age-related mental decline is escalating. Supplementation of functional foods for sustaining mental health is desirable. We examined the effect of long-term supplementation of complex milk lipid concentrate (CMLc), mixed dairy phospholipids, on memory and associated vascular and neuronal changes in aged rats. Methods: Fisher/Norway Brown rats were used. Two groups of aged rats (24 months) were fed with either gelatin-formulated CMLc or blank gelatin as the control, for 4 months. To determine age-related changes, a young group (5 months) was also fed with blank gelatin. Morris water maze tests were carried out after the supplementation and brain tissues were collected for biological analysis. Results: The aged control rats learnt to locate the platform slower than the young control rats during acquisition trials (*P < 0.05), and made fewer entries to and more initial heading errors from the platform zone during testing trials (*P < 0.05). The CMLc supplementation improved memory by showing the reduced initial heading errors in a delayed probe trial (P-# < 0.05). We also found that the aged rats with CMLc supplementation improved vascular density, dopamine output, and neuroplasticity (P-# < 0.05) in the brain regions involved in memory compared with that of the aged control rats. Discussion: The data suggested that the supplementation of CMLc during the early stage of brain aging may prevent memory decline possibly through improving vascular and neuronal function.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据