4.5 Editorial Material

Role of the incretin system in the remission of type 2 diabetes following bariatric surgery

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.numecd.2008.07.004

关键词

Morbid obesity; Incretins; Bariatric surgery

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aims: It has been observed, as a collateral outcome of bariatric surgery, that morbidly obese patients with frank type 2 diabetes mellitus or impaired glucose tolerance undergone Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (RYGB) or bilio-pancreatic diversion (BPD) became and remained euglycemic since surgery. But, most interestingly, the conversion to euglycemia happened within few days from the operation, tong before a significant weight loss could intervene. The purpose of this viewpoint is to try to elucidate the mechanisms involved in the resolution/remission of diabetes after bariatric surgery, in particular highlighting the role played by the modifications in incretin secretion. Data synthesis: The effect of purely restrictive procedures in improving glucose control is directly proportional to the degree of weight loss. In contrast, either RYGB or BPD, the first a mainly restrictive and the second a quite purely malabsorptive bariatric technique, operate through a different mechanism, as a probable consequence of the small intestine bypass. The bypass of different intestinal portions covers a central rote in the mechanisms of action of these two surgical procedures. In fact, white RYGB does not affect insulin resistance but increases insulin secretion via the stimulation of nutrient-mediated incretin secretion, BPD induces a full normalization of insulin resistance and, consequently, a significant reduction of insulin secretion. The insulin resistance reversion is only partially explained by the incretin level changes after BPD. Conclusion: A role of incretins in type 2 diabetes improvement or resolution is ascertained although it is possible that other, not yet identified, hormone(s) can cooperate with them. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据