4.5 Review

A systematic review and meta-analysis of the use of oral zinc in the treatment of hepatic encephalopathy

期刊

NUTRITION JOURNAL
卷 12, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/1475-2891-12-74

关键词

Therapy; Liver cirrhosis; Evidence-based medicine

资金

  1. Medica Sur Clinic Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background and aim: Because low serum zinc levels precipitate hepatic encephalopathy, zinc supplementation is considered a potential therapeutic option. The aim of this study was to assess the effects of oral zinc supplementation in the treatment of hepatic encephalopathy. Methods: For this systematic review and meta-analysis, data sources included electronic databases (CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE) and manual searching. Randomized clinical trials of adult patients diagnosed with liver cirrhosis and hepatic encephalopathy were included. The types of interventions considered were any oral zinc supplementation versus no intervention, placebo, or other interventions for the management of hepatic encephalopathy. The data were analyzed by calculating the RR for each trial and expressing the uncertainty as 95% CI. Continuous data were analyzed by calculating the standard mean differences (SMD) between groups within each trial and their 95% CI. Statistical heterogeneity was defined as a P-value > 0.10 (chi(2)) or I-2 > 25%. Results: Four trials with a total of 233 patients were included. Oral zinc supplementation was associated with a significant improvement in performance on the number connection test (SMD -0.62; 95% CI -1.12 to -0.11) reported in three trials (n = 189), but not with encephalopathy recurrence reduction (RR 0.64; 95% CI 0.26 to 1.59) reported in two trials (n = 169). Other clinically significant outcomes (mortality, liver related morbidity, quality of life) were not reported. Conclusion: Oral zinc supplementation improved performance on the number connection test, but no evidence about other clinical or biochemical outcomes was available.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据