4.4 Article

Global Use of the Practice Environment Scale of the Nursing Work Index

期刊

NURSING RESEARCH
卷 60, 期 1, 页码 17-31

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/NNR.0b013e3181ffa79c

关键词

nurse outcomes; nurse work environment; nurse workforce; PES-NWI; practice environment scale; patient outcomes; review

类别

资金

  1. Division of Nursing
  2. Bureau of Health Professions
  3. Health Resources and Services Administration
  4. Department of Health and Human Services [D66HP03170]
  5. National Institute of Nursing Research [T32NR008856]
  6. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NURSING RESEARCH [T32NR008856] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Although the Practice Environment Scale of the Nursing Work Index has been endorsed as a gauge of the quality of the nursing practice environment by several organizations in the United States promoting healthcare quality, there is no literature describing its use in different practice settings and countries. Objective: The purpose of this study was to inform research by describing the modifications and use of the scale in a variety of practice settings and countries. Methods: The Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature and the PubMed databases were searched for the years 2002-2010 to identify 37 research reports published since 2002 describing use, modification, and scoring variations in different practice settings and countries. Results: The scale was modified for 10 practice settings in five countries and translated into three languages. Composite scores ranged from 2.48 to 3.17 (on a 1-4 scale). The Staffing and Resource Adequacy subscale most often scored lowest. A new Nursing Information Technology subscale has been developed. New scoring methods to identify the favorability of practice environments are described. Over time, the nature of the research conducted using the measure has changed. Overall, most publications report significant associations between scale scores and multiple nurse, patient, and organizational outcomes. Discussion: Scale use is growing across different clinical settings and countries. Recommendations for future research use include reducing scale length, using consistent scoring methods, considering the impact of various modifications on the basis of cultural and clinical setting nuances, and using the measure in longitudinal and intervention research designs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据