4.2 Article

Unmasking the predicament of cultural voyeurism: a postcolonial analysis of international nursing placements

期刊

NURSING INQUIRY
卷 19, 期 3, 页码 190-201

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-1800.2011.00555.x

关键词

Bakhtin; international placements; cultural voyeurism; postcolonial feminism; cultural safety; undergraduate nursing education

类别

资金

  1. Institute for Philosophical Nursing Research, Faculty of Nursing, University of Alberta

向作者/读者索取更多资源

RACINE L and PERRON A. Nursing Inquiry 2012; 19: 190201 ?Unmasking the predicament of cultural voyeurism: a postcolonial analysis of international nursing placements The growing interest in international nursing placements cannot be left unnoticed. After 11 years into this twenty-first century, violations of human rights and freedom of speech, environmental disasters, and armed conflicts still create dire living conditions for men and women around the world. Nurses have an ethical duty to address issues of social justice and global health as a means to fulfil nursings social mandate. However, international placements raise some concerns. Drawing on the works of postcolonial theorists in nursing and social sciences, we examine the risk of replicating colonialist practices and discourses of health in international clinical placements. Referring to Bakhtins notions of dialogism and unfinalizability, we envision a culturally safe nursing practice arising from dialogical encounters between the Self as an Other and with the Other as an Other. We suggest that exploring the intricacies of cultural and race relations in everyday nursing practice are the premises upon which nurses can understand the broader historic, racial, gendered, political and economic contexts of global health issues. Finally, we make suggestions for developing culturally safe learning opportunities at the international level without minimizing the impact of dialogical cultural encounters occurring at the local and community levels.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据