4.8 Article

Base and nucleotide excision repair facilitate resolution of platinum drugs-induced transcription blockage

期刊

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
卷 46, 期 18, 页码 9537-9549

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gky764

关键词

-

资金

  1. European Research Council Advanced Grant [340988-ERC]
  2. Dutch Cancer Society [KWF] [10506]
  3. FP7 Marie Curie International Training Network aDDRess [316390]
  4. Worldwide Cancer Research [15-1274]
  5. EMBO long-term fellowship [ALTF 663-2014]
  6. Oncode Institute - Dutch Cancer Society
  7. Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO)
  8. European Research Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Sensitivity and resistance of cells to platinum drug chemotherapy are to a large extent determined by activity of the DNA damage response (DDR). Combining chemotherapy with inhibition of specific DDR pathways could therefore improve treatment efficacy. Multiple DDR pathways have been implicated in removal of platinum-DNA lesions, but it is unclear which exact pathways are most important to cellular platinum drug resistance. Here, we used CRISPR/Cas9 screening to identify DDR proteins that protect colorectal cancer cells against the clinically applied platinum drug oxaliplatin. We find that besides the expected homologous recombination, Fanconi anemia and translesion synthesis pathways, in particular also transcription-coupled nucleotide excision repair (TC-NER) and base excision repair (BER) protect against platinum-induced cytotoxicity. Both repair pathways are required to overcome oxaliplatin-and cisplatin-induced transcription arrest. In addition to the generation of DNA crosslinks, exposure to platinum drugs leads to reactive oxygen species production that induces oxidative DNA lesions, explaining the requirement for BER. Our findings highlight the importance of transcriptional integrity in cells exposed to platinum drugs and suggest that both TC-NER and BER should be considered as targets for novel combinatorial treatment strategies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据