4.8 Article

Computational analysis of amino acids and their sidechain analogs in crowded solutions of RNA nucleobases with implications for the mRNA-protein complementarity hypothesis

期刊

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
卷 42, 期 21, 页码 12984-12994

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gku1035

关键词

-

资金

  1. Austrian Science Fund FWF [START Y 514-B11]
  2. European Research Council [ERC] [279408]
  3. European Research Council (ERC) [279408] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Many critical processes in the cell involve direct binding between RNAs and proteins, making it imperative to fully understand the physicochemical principles behind such interactions at the atomistic level. Here, we use molecular dynamics simulations and 15 mu s of sampling to study the behavior of amino acids and amino acid sidechain analogs in high-concentration aqueous solutions of standard RNA nucleobases. Structural and energetic analysis of simulated systems allows us to derive interaction propensity scales for different amino acid/nucleobase combinations. The derived scales closely match and greatly extend the available experimental data, providing a comprehensive foundation for studying RNA-protein interactions in different contexts. By using these scales, we demonstrate a statistically significant connection between nucleobase composition of human mRNA coding sequences and nucleobase interaction propensities of their cognate protein sequences. For example, pyrimidine density profiles of mRNAs match uracil-propensity profiles of their cognate proteins with a median Pearson correlation coefficient of R = -0.70. Our results provide support for the recently proposed hypotheses that mRNAs and their cognate proteins may be physicochemically complementary to each other and bind, especially if unstructured, with the complementarity level being negatively influenced by mRNA adenine content. Finally, we utilize the derived scales to refine the complementarity hypothesis and closely examine its physicochemical underpinnings.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据