4.8 Article

Molecular characterization of an adaptive response to alkylating agents in the opportunistic pathogen Aspergillus fumigatus

期刊

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
卷 40, 期 16, 页码 7806-7820

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gks522

关键词

-

资金

  1. Irish Research Council for Science and Engineering Technology
  2. Science Foundation Ireland Research Frontiers [08/RFP/BMT1439]
  3. Cancer Research UK
  4. National University of Ireland Maynooth
  5. Science Foundation Ireland (SFI) [08/RFP/BMT1439] Funding Source: Science Foundation Ireland (SFI)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An adaptive response to alkylating agents based upon the conformational change of a methylphosphotriester (MPT) DNA repair protein to a transcriptional activator has been demonstrated in a number of bacterial species, but this mechanism appears largely absent from eukaryotes. Here, we demonstrate that the human pathogen Aspergillus fumigatus elicits an adaptive response to sub-lethal doses of the mono-functional alkylating agent N-methyl-N'-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine (MNNG). We have identified genes that encode MPT and O-6-alkylguanine DNA alkyltransferase (AGT) DNA repair proteins; deletions of either of these genes abolish the adaptive response and sensitize the organism to MNNG. In vitro DNA repair assays confirm the ability of MPT and AGT to repair methylphosphotriester and O-6-methylguanine lesions respectively. In eukaryotes, the MPT protein is confined to a select group of fungal species, some of which are major mammalian and plant pathogens. The evolutionary origin of the adaptive response is bacterial and rooted within the Firmicutes phylum. Inter-kingdom horizontal gene transfer between Firmicutes and Ascomycete ancestors introduced the adaptive response into the Fungal kingdom. Our data constitute the first detailed characterization of the molecular mechanism of the adaptive response in a lower eukaryote and has applications for development of novel fungal therapeutics targeting this DNA repair system.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据