4.8 Article

Highly fluorescent guanosine mimics for folding and energy transfer studies

期刊

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
卷 39, 期 15, 页码 6825-6834

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkr281

关键词

-

资金

  1. University of Zurich Forschungskredit [57131901]
  2. Swiss National Science Foundation [130074]
  3. Swiss Federal Grant

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Guanosines with substituents at the 8-position can provide useful fluorescent probes that effectively mimic guanine residues even in highly demanding model systems such as polymorphic G-quadruplexes and duplex DNA. Here, we report the synthesis and photophysical properties of a small family of 8-substituted-2'-deoxyguanosines that have been incorporated into the human telomeric repeat sequence using phosphoramidite chemistry. These include 8-(2-pyridyl)-2'-deoxyguanosine (2PyG), 8-(2-phenylethenyl)-2'-deoxyguanosine (StG) and 8-[2(pyrid-4-yl)-ethenyl]-2'-deoxyguanosine (4PVG). On DNA folding and stability, 8-substituted guanosines can exhibit context-dependent effects but were better tolerated by G-quadruplex and duplex structures than pyrimidine mismatches. In contrast to previously reported fluorescent guanine analogs, 8-substituted guanosines exhibit similar or even higher quantum yields upon their incorporation into nucleic acids (Phi = 0.02-0.45). We have used these highly emissive probes to quantify energy transfer efficiencies from unmodified DNA nucleobases to 8-substituted guanosines. The resulting DNA-to-probe energy transfer efficiencies (eta(t)) are highly structure selective, with eta(t)(duplex) < eta(t)(single-strand) < eta(t)(G-quadruplex). These trends were independent of the exact structural features and thermal stabilities of the G-quadruplexes or duplexes containing them. The combination of efficient energy transfer, high probe quantum yield, and high molar extinction coefficient of the DNA provides a highly sensitive and reliable readout of G-quadruplex formation even in highly diluted sample solutions of 0.25 nM.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据