4.8 Article

Interaction of Borrelia burgdorferi Hbb with the p66 promoter

期刊

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
卷 38, 期 2, 页码 414-427

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkp1027

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [R01 AI51407, R01 AI059505, T32-AI-07422, F31 AI52495]
  2. Division of Intramural Research
  3. National Institutes of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health
  4. National Institutes of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases [P30DK39428]
  5. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES [F31AI052495, ZIAAI000492, R01AI059505, T32AI007422, R01AI051407] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Borrelia burgdorferi, an agent of Lyme disease, encodes the beta(3)-chain integrin ligand P66. P66 is expressed by B. burgdorferi in the mammal, in laboratory media, and as the bacteria are acquired or transmitted by the tick, but is not expressed by the bacterium in unfed ticks. Attempts to reveal factors influencing expression revealed that P66 was expressed in all in vitro conditions investigated. Candidate regulators identified in a search of the B. burgdorferi genome for homologs to other bacterial transcription factors were cloned and introduced into E. coli carrying a p66 promoter-signal sequence-phoA (alkaline phosphatase, or AP) fusion. Three candidate transcription factors-two that decreased AP activity (Hbb and BB0527), and one that increased AP activity (BBA23)-were identified. BBA23 and BB0527 did not bind to the p66 promoter at physiologically relevant concentrations. In contrast, several promoter fragments, including p66, were bound by Hbb (BB0232), with slightly different affinities. Consistent with results from other laboratories, Hbb appears to recognize multiple DNA sequences. Changes in the expression of p66 and bb0232 in the tick at various points with respect to feeding on mice, along with the results of the reporter experiment in the surrogate host E. coli, are consistent with Hbb/BB0232 being involved in regulating p66 expression.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据