4.2 Article Proceedings Paper

A Review of the CFD Modeling Progress Triggered by ISP-47 on Containment Thermal Hydraulics

期刊

NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING
卷 193, 期 1-2, 页码 63-80

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/00295639.2018.1503858

关键词

ISP-47; computational fluid dynamics; containment; buoyant flows; condensation

资金

  1. RWTH Aachen University [150 1407, 150 1489]
  2. Forschungszentrum Juelich [150 1407, 150 1489]
  3. German Federal Ministry of Economic Affairs and Energy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)/Nuclear Energy Agency International Standard Problem 47 (ISP-47) was aimed at assessing the predictive capabilities of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) and lumped-parameter codes regarding hydrogen mixing under representative thermal-hydraulic conditions of a loss-of-coolant-accident. The benchmark consisted of two systematic steps. The first step was a fundamental model assessment based on quasi-steady-state separate-effects tests in the French TOSQAN facility (7m(3), IRSN, Saclay) and MISTRA facility (100m(3), CEA, Saclay) regarding steam condensation, buoyant turbulent flows, and mixed atmospheric conditions. The second step was based on a more realistic experimental transient in the multicompartmented German Thermal-hydraulics, Hydrogen, Aerosols and Iodine (THAI) facility (60m(3), Becker Technologies, Eschborn). At that time, the blind and open analysis revealed that CFD codes needed further improvement regarding modeling of turbulence in buoyant flows, steam condensation, temperature and species concentration, and stratification buildup as well as their dissolution. This result triggered a comprehensive experimental and analytical effort, e.g., within the German national THAI, the OECD-THAI, and the OECD-SETH-1 and OECD-SETH-2 projects. Now, 10years later, this paper aims to benchmark the state-of-the-art containment CFD model, developed at Forschungszentrum Juelich and RWTH Aachen University, and to highlight the progress made and the remaining open issues.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据