4.1 Article

Biodistribution study and identification of inflammatory sites using nanocapsules labeled with 99mTc-HMPAO

期刊

NUCLEAR MEDICINE COMMUNICATIONS
卷 30, 期 9, 页码 749-755

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MNM.0b013e32832f2b59

关键词

biodistribution; hexametylpropyleneamine oxime; inflammation; nanocapsules; scintigraphic images; technetium-99m

资金

  1. FAPEMIG/NANOBIOMG Network
  2. CNPq
  3. FINEP

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose To evaluate the ability of polymeric nanocapsules (NCs) radiolabeled with technetium-99m D,L-hexamethylpropylenea mine oxime (Tc-99m-HMPAO) to identify inflammatory process in an experimental model. Methods NCs were prepared by interfacial deposition of preformed biodegradable polymer [Poly (D,L-lactic acid) (PLA) and PLA-PEG (polyethyleneglycol)] followed by a solvent displacement. The size and homogeneity, and zeta potential of the NC preparations were determined in a Zetasizer by photon correlation spectroscopy and laser Doppler anemometry, respectively. The NCs radiolabeled with Tc-99m-HMPAO were administered intravenously to Wistar male rats bearing a focal inflammation induced by subplantar injection of carrageenan in the right foot. At preestablished time intervals, the animals were anesthetized, tissues were removed and radioactivity was determined using an automatic scintillation apparatus. Results The average diameter calculated by photon correlation spectroscopy varied from 216 to 323 nm. The biodistribution studies showed a greater uptake of the PEG surface-modified Tc-99m-HMPAO-NC by the inflamed paws when compared with the respective controls. There was no significant difference in the uptake of conventional Tc-99m-HMPAO-NC and of free Tc-99m-HMPAO by inflamed and control paws. These results indicate that the PLA-PEG Tc-99m-NC showed a higher uptake in inflammation compared with free complex and may be useful as a radiotracer to identify these foci. Nucl Med Commun 30:749-755 (C) 2009 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据