3.9 Article

Validity and Reliability Study for the Turkish Adaptation of the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7)Scale

期刊

出版社

TURKISH NEUROPSYCHIATRY ASSOC-TURK NOROPSIKIYATRI DERNEGI
DOI: 10.4274/npa.y6308

关键词

Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) scale-Turkish version; validity; reliability

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: Our objective was to identify the validity, reliability and psychometric features of the Turkish adaptation of the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) scale. Method: Patients who were diagnosed with 110 GAD patients and 112 healthy control subjects were included in this study. Three weeks after the initial administration, a certain group of the sample was administered the GAD-7 scale again. The principal components analysis for structural validity and confirmatory factor analysis were performed. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve analysis was performed to identify the distinguishing feature. Positive predictive value, negative predictive value, positive and negative likelihood ratios were calculated at different cut-off levels. Results: The total scores for the GAD-7 scale-Turkish version in the GAD group were found to be statistically significantly higher than those in the control group. A significant correlation was observed between all items of the GAD-7 scale Turkish version that was found to have good internal consistency and intermittent administration. In the factor analysis performed for assessing the construct validity, the factor structure of the GAD-7 scale-Turkish version was found to be similar to the original form and the construct validity was found to be good. Good compliance to single factor structure was observed in the confirmatory factor analysis. The most acceptable cut-off point of the GAD-7 scale-Turkish version was found to be 8. Conclusion: The GAD-7 scale-Turkish version, similar to the original form, was found to have a high validity, reliability and good psychometric features in a clinical sample. The Turkish version of the GAD-7 scale was regarded as a useful screening tool. (Archives of Neuropsychiatry 2013; 50: 53-58)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据