4.5 Article

Exposure to Nicotine During Pregnancy and Altered Learning and Memory in the Rat Offspring

期刊

NICOTINE & TOBACCO RESEARCH
卷 17, 期 6, 页码 661-666

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntu178

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Key Scientific Research projects [2012CB947600, 2013BAI04B05]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81070540, 81030006, 81320108006, 81370719]
  3. Jiangsu Key Discipline/Laboratory and Chuang Xin Tuan Dui funds
  4. Jiangsu Key Discipline of Human Assisted Reproduction Medicine funds

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction: Prenatal exposure to nicotine can cause many fetal developmental problems. This study determined the influence of nicotine during pregnancy on the development of cognitive behavior in the offspring. Methods: Nicotine was administered to pregnant rats through implanted osmotic mini-pumps at 6 mg/kg/day and flow rate of 60 mu l/day for whole pregnancy from gestational day 4. Fetal and offspring body and brain weight was measured. Learning and memory were tested in adult offspring with Morris water maze; Learning and memory-related receptors were measured. Results: The results showed that exposure to prenatal nicotine (PN) not only caused fetal growth restriction, but also had long-term effects on learning and memory in the offspring. The PN offspring exhibited longer escape latency regardless of sex. The number of passing the platform was significantly less in the PN offspring than that of the control. The expression of messenger RNA (mRNA) and protein of N-methyl-D-aspartic acid receptor (NMDAR) in the hippocampus was significantly increased, whereas alpha7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (alpha(7) nAChR) protein was decreased with unchanged alpha(7) nAChR mRNA in the PN offspring. Conclusion: The data provided novel information on the PN-affected development in learning and memory in the offspring, suggesting that alpha(7) nAChR and NMDAR1 in the hippocampus might be the targets for actions of PN in association with memory impairment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据