4.4 Article

Alteration of pasture root carbon turnover in response to superphosphate and irrigation at Winchmore New Zealand

期刊

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/00288233.2012.662896

关键词

below ground net primary production; carbon pulse-labelling; C-13 recovery; irrigation; root allocation; root turnover; fertiliser

资金

  1. Agricultural and Marketing Research and Development Trust
  2. New Zealand Fertiliser Manufacturer's Research Association
  3. New Zealand Foundation for Research Science and Technology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Grassland net primary productivity, carbon (C) allocation to roots, root production and subsequent turnover time in grazed pastures have significant implications for modelling landuse effects on global carbon dynamics. The objective of this work, using the decline of assimilated C-13, was to quantify C allocation to roots, root production and turnover time in response to long-term fertiliser and irrigation treatments. The treatments on the pastures on a long-term research site at Winchmore, Canterbury, New Zealand were 0 or 375 kg ha(-1) y(-1) superphosphate under irrigation and, on a nearby irrigation experiment, unirrigated or irrigated (with fertilisation of 250 kg ha(-1) y(-1) superphosphate) when the soil water content fell to 20% w/w (50% available moisture). The pasture treatments were pulse-labelled using (CO2)-C-13 within portable gas-tight enclosures. Separate micro-plots were (CO2)-C-13 pulse-labelled in late spring, summer and autumn. Below ground net primary production (206 g C m(-2) y(-1)) was similar in unfertilised, unirrigated, fertilised and irrigated pastures, despite marked differences in above ground production. Unfertilised/irrigated and unirrigated/fertilised treatments had greater root biomass, root C allocation and longer root turnover time (1.9 y and 2.0 y, respectively) than fertilised and irrigated treatments (1.3 y). These root turnover times appeared to be consistent with the improved substrate quality attributed to the species found in the irrigated and fertilised treatments.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据