4.6 Article

A new pollinating seed-consuming mutualism between Rheum nobile and a fly fungus gnat, Bradysia sp., involving pollinator attraction by a specific floral compound

期刊

NEW PHYTOLOGIST
卷 203, 期 4, 页码 1109-1118

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/nph.12856

关键词

Bradysia; floral scent; Himalayas; mutualism; pollination; Rheum nobile; seed consumption

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [40930209, 31061160184, 31100179, 31200184]
  2. Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDB03030112, 2011312D11022]
  3. CAS/SAFEA
  4. Natural Science Foundation of Yunnan Province [2011FB102]
  5. Western Light Talent Culture Project [2014312D11015]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Pollinating seed-consuming mutualisms are regarded as exemplary models for studying coevolution, but they are extremely rare. In these systems, olfactory cues have been thought to play an important role in facilitating encounters between partners. We present a new pollinating seed-consuming mutualism from the high Himalayas between the endemic herb, Rheum nobile, and a fly fungus gnat, Bradysia sp. Seed production resulting from pollination by Bradysia flies and seed consumption by their larvae were measured to determine the outcome of this interaction. Floral scent analyses and behavioural tests were conducted to investigate the role of olfactory cues in pollinator attraction. Rheum nobile is self-compatible, but it depends mainly on Bradysia sp. females for pollination. Seed production resulting from pollination by adult flies is substantially higher than subsequent seed consumption by their larvae. Behavioural tests showed that an unusual floral compound, 2-methyl butyric acid methyl ester, emitted by plants only during anthesis, was attractive to female flies. Our results indicate that the R. nobile-Bradysia sp. interaction represents a new pollinating seed-consuming mutualism, and that a single unusual compound is the specific signal in the floral scent of R. nobile that plays a key role in attracting its pollinator.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据