4.6 Article

Xylem formation can be modeled statistically as a function of primary growth and cambium activity

期刊

NEW PHYTOLOGIST
卷 203, 期 3, 页码 831-841

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/nph.12859

关键词

boreal forest; ecosystem; mixed-effects model; phenology; primary growth; secondary growth; tree growth; xylem formation

资金

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)
  2. Canada Mitacs-Acceleration Quebec-Programme de Stages de Recherche, Produits forestiers Resolu
  3. 100 Talents Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS)
  4. South China Botanical Garden of the CAS [201401]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Primary (budburst, foliage and shoot) growth and secondary (cambium and xylem) growth of plants play a vital role in sequestering atmospheric carbon. However, their potential relationships have never been mathematically quantified and the underlying physiological mechanisms are unclear. We monitored primary and secondary growth in Picea mariana and Abies balsamea on a weekly basis from 2010 to 2013 at four sites over an altitudinal gradient (25-900 m) in the eastern Canadian boreal forest. We determined the timings of onset and termination through the fitted functions and their first derivative. We quantified the potential relationships between primary growth and secondary growth using the mixed-effects model. We found that xylem formation of boreal conifers can be modeled as a function of cambium activity, bud phenology, and shoot and needle growth, as well as species-and site-specific factors. Our model reveals that there may be an optimal mechanism to simultaneously allocate the photosynthetic products and stored nonstructural carbon to growth of different organs at different times in the growing season. This mathematical link can bridge phenological modeling, forest ecosystem productivity and carbon cycle modeling, which will certainly contribute to an improved prediction of ecosystem productivity and carbon equilibrium.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据