4.6 Article

The regulation of cambial activity in Chinese fir (Cunninghamia lanceolata) involves extensive transcriptome remodeling

期刊

NEW PHYTOLOGIST
卷 199, 期 3, 页码 708-719

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/nph.12301

关键词

Chinese fir (Cunninghamia lanceolata); RNA-Seq; transcriptome; vascular cambium; wood formation

资金

  1. Major Science Foundation of Ministry of Education of China [313008]
  2. National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) [2009CB118500]
  3. Ministry of Agriculture of China [2011ZX08002-003, 2009ZX08009-095B]
  4. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2012M520457]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Chinese fir (Cunninghamia lanceolata), a commercially important tree for the timber and pulp industry, is widely distributed in southern China and northern Vietnam, but its large and complex genome has hindered the development of genomic resources. Few efforts have focused on analysis of the modulation of transcriptional networks in vascular cambium during the transition from active growth to dormancy in conifers. Here, we used Illumina sequencing to analyze the global transcriptome alterations at the different stages of vascular cambium development in Chinese fir. By analyzing dynamic changes in the transcriptome of vascular cambium based on our RNA sequencing (RNA-Seq) data at the dormant, reactivating and active stages, many potentially interesting genes were identified that encoded putative regulators of cambial activity, cell division, cell expansion and cell wall biosynthesis and modification. In particular, the genes involved in transcriptional regulation and hormone signaling were highlighted to reveal their biological importance in the cambium development and wood formation. Our results reveal the dynamics of transcriptional networks and identify potential key components in the regulation of vascular cambium development in Chinese fir, which will contribute to the in-depth study of cambial differentiation and wood-forming candidate genes in conifers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据