4.6 Review

Natural variation in GA1 associates with floral morphology in Arabidopsis thaliana

期刊

NEW PHYTOLOGIST
卷 195, 期 1, 页码 58-70

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2012.04145.x

关键词

ABC model; association analysis; candidate genes; petal and stamen length; stamen exsertion

资金

  1. NSF [DBI-0227103]
  2. BBSRC
  3. BBSRC [BB/D016029/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/D016029/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  5. Direct For Biological Sciences
  6. Division Of Integrative Organismal Systems [923752] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The genetic architecture of floral traits is evolutionarily important due to the fitness consequences of quantitative variation in floral morphology. Yet, little is known about the genes underlying these traits in natural populations. Using Arabidopsis thaliana, we examine molecular variation at GIBBERELLIC ACID REQUIRING 1 (GA1) and test for associations with floral morphology. We examined full-length sequence in 32 accessions and describe two haplotypes (comprising four nonsynonymous polymorphisms) in GA1 that segregate at intermediate frequencies. In 133 A.thaliana accessions, we test for genotypephenotype associations and corroborate these findings in segregating progenies. The two common GA1 haplotypes were associated with the length of petals, stamens, and to a lesser extent style-stigma length. Associations were confirmed in a segregating progeny developed from 19 accessions. We find analogous results in recombinant inbred lines of the Bayreuth x Shahdara cross, which differ only at one of 4 SNPs, suggesting that this SNP may contribute to the observed association. Assuming GA1 causally affects floral organ size, it is interesting that adjacent petal and stamen whorls are most strongly affected. This pattern suggests that GA1 could contribute to the greater strength of petalstamen correlations relative to other floral-length correlations observed in some Brassicaceous species.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据