4.6 Article

SIMULATION OF AND TRAINING FOR CEREBRAL ANEURYSM CLIPPING WITH 3-DIMENSIONAL MODELS

期刊

NEUROSURGERY
卷 65, 期 4, 页码 719-725

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000354350.88899.07

关键词

Cerebral aneurysm; Clipping; Surgical simulation; Surgical training; 3-dimensional modeling

资金

  1. Japan National Cardiovascular Center
  2. Advanced Medical & PharmaCCLIfical Research

向作者/读者索取更多资源

OBJECTIVE: With improvements in endovascular techniques, fewer aneurysms are treated by surgical clipping, and those aneurysms targeted for open surgery are often complex and difficult to treat. We devised a hollow, 3-dimensional (3D) model of individual cerebral aneurysms for preoperative simulation and surgical training. The methods and initial experience with this model system are presented. METHODS: The 3D hollow aneurysm models of 3 retrospective and 8 prospective cases were made with a prototyping technique according to data from 3D computed tomographic angiograms of each patient. Commercially available titanium clips used in our routine surgery were applied, and the internal lumen was observed with an endoscope to confirm the patency of parent vessels. The actual surgery was performed later. RESULTS: In the 8 prospective cases, the clips were applied during surgery in the same direction and configuration as in the preoperative simulation. Fine adjustments were necessary in each case, and 2 patients needed additional clips to occlude the atherosclerotic aneurysmal wall. With these 3D models, it was easy for neurosurgical trainees to grasp the vascular configuration and the concept of neck occlusion. Practicing surgery with these models also improved their handling of the instruments used during aneurysm surgery, such as clips and appliers. CONCLUSION: Using the hollow 3D models to simulate clipping preoperatively, we could treat the aneurysms confidently during live surgery. These models allow easy and concrete recognition of the 3D configuration of aneurysms and parent vessels.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据