4.3 Article

Decorrelation of sensory-evoked neuronal responses in rat barrel cortex during postnatal development

期刊

NEUROSCIENCE RESEARCH
卷 73, 期 4, 页码 312-320

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neures.2012.05.009

关键词

Somatosensory cortex; Whisker; Multiple single-unit recording; Pooling; Noise correlation; Population coding; Cross-correlogram; Silicon probes

资金

  1. Japan Science and Technology Agency
  2. Ministry of Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan [08108015, 20500285, 23135521, 23135522]
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [23240047, 23135521, 23650206, 23135522, 20500285] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The ability to detect and discriminate sensory stimuli greatly improves with age. To better understand the neural basis of perceptual development, we studied the postnatal development of sensory responses in cortical neurons. Specifically, we analyzed neuronal responses to single-whisker deflections in the posteromedial barrel subfield (PMBSF) of the rat primary somatosensory cortex. Responses of PMBSF neurons showed a long onset latency and duration in the first postnatal week, but became fast and transient over the next few weeks. Trial-by-trial variations of single neuron responses did not change systematically with age, whereas the covariation of responses across trials between neurons (noise correlation) was high on postnatal day 5-6 (P5-6), and gradually decreased with age to near zero by P30-31. Computational analyses showed that pooled responses of multiple neurons became more reliable across stimulus trials with age. The period over which these changes occurred corresponds to the period when rats develop a full set of exploratory whisking behavior. We suggest that reduced noise correlation across a population of neurons, in addition to sharpening the temporal characteristics of single neuron responses, may help improve behavioral performance. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ireland Ltd and the Japan Neuroscience Society. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据