4.4 Article

Intranuclear dynamics of corticosteroid receptors and effects of proteasomal activity in cultured hippocampal neural cells

期刊

NEUROSCIENCE LETTERS
卷 494, 期 1, 页码 65-69

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2011.02.058

关键词

Glucocorticoid receptor; Mineralocorticoid receptor; Fluorescence recovery after photobleaching; Hippocampus; Intranuclear dynamics; Proteasome

资金

  1. MEXT
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [22659040] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Adrenal corticosteroids readily enter the brain and exert markedly diverse effects, such as stress responses in the target neural cells. These effects are regulated by two receptor systems via the mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) and the glucocorticoid receptor (GR), which are both ligand-dependent transcription factors. Several steroid hormone receptors including GR, estrogen receptor, and androgen receptor, have been shown to move rapidly in the nucleus even after ligand treatment, supposedly corresponding to transcriptional fine-tuning. We applied fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) to assess the mobility of green fluorescent protein (GFP)-tagged GR and -MR in the nucleus of transiently transfected cultured hippocampal neurons. FRAP results showed high mobility of GR and MR in the nucleus. Half-recovery time of GR was longer than that of MR in the presence of 10-6 m corticosterone (CORT), but shorter in the presence of 10(-9) M CORT. Proteasome inhibition reduced the subnuclear mobility of GR and MR, and increased the transcriptional activity at both concentrations of CORT. We also investigated the differential effects of CORT concentration and proteasome inhibition on the nuclear retention level of these receptors. Our findings may provide intriguing new insights into the dynamics of corticosteroid receptors in neural cells and the molecular basis of stress regulation by these receptors in the hippocampus. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据