4.4 Article

Panic disorder and serotonergic genes (SLC6A4, HTR1A and HTR2A): Association and interaction with childhood trauma and parenting

期刊

NEUROSCIENCE LETTERS
卷 485, 期 1, 页码 11-15

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2010.08.042

关键词

Gene-environment interaction; Panic disorder; HTR1A; HTR2A; 5-HTTLPR; SLC6A4

资金

  1. Fundacao de Incentivo a Pesquisa (FIPE-HCPA) [04-272]
  2. CAPES
  3. CNPq [301533/2006-7, 504838/2009-1, 505066/2007-6]
  4. Rose and Eugene Kleiner Family Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: The aim of this study is to evaluate the association between HTR1A, HTR2A and the 5-HTTLPR in panic disorder (PD) patients and controls. In addition, this study also aims to evaluate the interaction between these genes and two environmental factors previously associated with PD: childhood trauma and parental bonding. Methods: This is a case-control candidate gene association study (107 PD patients and 125 controls). Genes were analyzed using a gene-based test in PLINK followed by single marker association tests and haplotype test only for genes that reached experiment-wide significance in the gene-based test in order to minimize multiple testing. Logistic regression was used to test the relationships between genotype in the additive model, trauma, optimal paternal parenting and optimal maternal parenting and their interactions. Results: Only HTR1A was associated with PD in gene-based test after correction for multiple tests (p(corrected) = 0.027) and one HTR1A haplotype comprising four SNPs was associated with PD (p(corrected) = 0.032). In the interaction analysis, no significant gene-environment interaction was found with the genes evaluated. Conclusion: This study reinforces the association between HTR1A and PD. No major evidence of gene-environment interaction in PD with parenting or trauma was found. Further studies are necessary in order to confirm these findings. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据