4.4 Article

Identification of proteins regulated by estradiol in focal cerebral ischemic injury-A proteomics approach

期刊

NEUROSCIENCE LETTERS
卷 477, 期 2, 页码 66-71

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2010.04.028

关键词

Estradiol; Neuroprotection; Proteomics

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Science and Technology [2009-0070571]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea [2009-0070571] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Estradiol protects neuronal cells against permanent and focal ischemic brain damage. We identified the proteins that are expressed following estradiol administration during cerebral ischemia in an animal model. Adult female rats were ovariectomized and treated with oil or estradiol prior to middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO) to induce cerebral ischemia, and brains were collected 24h after MCAO. Protein analysis was performed on the cerebral cortex using two-dimensional gel electrophoresis. Protein spots with difference in intensity between oil- and estradiol-treated groups were identified by mass spectrometry. Among these proteins, levels of protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A) and astrocytic phosphoprotein PEA-15 were significantly decreased in the oil-treated group in comparison to the estradiol-treated group. Moreover, Western blot analysis demonstrated that estradiol treatment prevents injury-induced decrease of PP2A and PEA-15 levels during both MCAO-induced injury and glutamate exposure in HT22 cells. In contrast, levels of the 60 kDa heat shock protein (Hsp 60) were significantly increased in oil-treated animals, while estradiol prevented the injury-induced increase of Hsp 60. The results of this study provide an evidence that estradiol protects neuronal cells against ischemic brain injury through the up- and down-modulation of specific proteins. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据