4.7 Review

The theory of bipolar disorder as an illness of accelerated aging: Implications for clinical care and research

期刊

NEUROSCIENCE AND BIOBEHAVIORAL REVIEWS
卷 42, 期 -, 页码 157-169

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.02.004

关键词

Bipolar disorder; Aging; Biomarkers; Neuroprogression; Telomeres; Inflammation; lmmunosenescence; BDNF; Oxidative stress; Amyloid; Cognition; Molecular imaging

资金

  1. Coordination of Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES)
  2. National Counsel of Technological and Scientific Development (CNPq)
  3. Sao Paulo Research Foundation (Fapesp)
  4. Heart & Stroke Foundation Centre for Stroke Recovery
  5. Toronto Rehabilitation Institute

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bipolar Disorder (BD) has been conceptualized as both a cyclic and a progressive disorder. Mechanisms involved in neuroprogression in BD remain largely unknown although several non-mutually exclusive models have been proposed as explanatory frameworks. In the present paper, we propose that the pathophysiological changes observed in BD (e.g. brain structural alterations, cognitive deficits, oxidative stress imbalance, amyloid metabolism, immunological deregulation, immunosenescence, neurotrophic deficiencies and telomere shortening) converge on a model of accelerated aging (AA). Aging can be understood as a multidimensional process involving physical, neuropsychological, and social changes, which can be highly variable between individuals. Determinants of successful aging (e.g environmental and genetic factors), may also confer differential vulnerability to components of BD pathophysiology and contribute to the clinical presentation of BD. Herein we discuss how the understanding of aging and senescence can contribute to the search for new and promising molecular targets to explain and ameliorate neuroprogression in BD. We also present the strengths and limitations of this concept. (c) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据