4.7 Review

Emotion recognition in Huntington's disease: A systematic review

期刊

NEUROSCIENCE AND BIOBEHAVIORAL REVIEWS
卷 36, 期 1, 页码 237-253

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2011.06.002

关键词

Huntington's disease; Emotion recognition; Cognition; Neurodegenerative disorders

资金

  1. Wellcome Trust [075696/Z/04/Z]
  2. MRC
  3. NIHR
  4. CHDI Foundation
  5. Euro-HD Network
  6. EU
  7. UK HD association
  8. Brain Research Trust
  9. Institute of Neurology (UCL), Multiple Sclerosis Trial Collaboration and Effective Intervention (Centre for Economic Performance, London School of Economics)
  10. Department of Health
  11. NIHR Biomedical Research Centres
  12. Alzheimer's Research Trust
  13. Alzheimers Research UK [ART-EG2010B-1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

There is increasing interest in the nature of the emotion recognition deficit in Huntington's disease (HD). There are conflicting reports of disproportionate impairments for some emotions in some modalities in HD. A systematic review and narrative synthesis was conducted for studies investigating emotion recognition in HD. Embase, MEDLINE, PsychINFO and Pubmed were searched from 1993 to 2010, and citations and reference lists were searched. 1724 citations were identified. Sixteen studies were included. In manifest HD evidence of impaired recognition of facial expressions of anger was found consistently, although recognition of all negative emotions (facial and vocal) tended to be impaired. In premanifest HD impairments were inconsistent, but are seen in all facial expressions of negative emotion. Inconsistency may represent the variability inherent in HD although may also be due to between-study differences in methodology. Current evidence supports the conclusion that recognition of all negative emotions tends to be impaired in HD, particularly in the facial domain. Future work should focus on using more ecologically-valid tests, and testing inter-modality differences. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据