4.5 Article

COMBINED EFFECT OF BRAIN-DERIVED NEUROTROPHIC FACTOR AND LINGO-1 FUSION PROTEIN ON LONG-TERM SURVIVAL OF RETINAL GANGLION CELLS IN CHRONIC GLAUCOMA

期刊

NEUROSCIENCE
卷 162, 期 2, 页码 375-382

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2009.04.075

关键词

ocular hypertension; neural cells; neuronal survival; neurotrophic factors; TrkB

资金

  1. NSFC [30801272]
  2. RFDP [200805581160]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province of China [8451008901000852]
  4. Science and Technology Foundation of Guangdong Province of China [2006B36004010]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Glaucoma is a progressive neuropathy characterized by loss of vision as a result of retinal ganglion cell (RGC) death. There are no effective neuroprotectants to treat this disorder. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) is well known to transiently delay RGC death in ocular hypertensive eyes. The CNS-specific leucine-rich repeat protein LINGO-1 contributes to the negative regulation to some trophic pathways. We thereby examined whether BDNF combined with LINGO-1 antagonists can promote long-term RGC survival after ocular hypertension. In this study, intraocular pressure was elevated in adult rats using an argon laser to photocoagulate the episcleral and limbal veins. BDNF alone shows slight neuroprotection to RGCs after a long-term progress of 4 weeks following the induction of ocular hypertension. However, combination of BDNF and LINGO-1-Fc prevents RGC death in the same condition. We further identified that (1) LINGO-1 was co-expressed with BDNF receptor, TrkB in the RGCs, and (2) BDNF combined with LINGO-1-Fc activated more TrkB in the injured retina compared to BDNF lone. These results indicate that the combination of BDNF with LINGO-1 antagonist can provide long-term protection for RGCs in a chronic ocular hypertension model. TrkB may be the predominant mediator of this neuroprotection. (C) 2009 IBRO. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据