4.5 Article

FUNCTIONAL TETRODOTOXIN-RESISTANT Na+ CHANNELS ARE EXPRESSED PRESYNAPTICALLY IN RAT DORSAL ROOT GANGLIA NEURONS

期刊

NEUROSCIENCE
卷 159, 期 2, 页码 559-569

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2008.12.029

关键词

Nav1.8; Nav1.9; SBFI; tetrodotoxin; synaptic transmission; sensory synapse

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [NS054614]
  2. American Heart Association National Scientist Development Grant

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The tetrodotoxin-resistant (TTX-R) voltage-gated Na+ channels Na(v)1.8 and Na(v)1.9 are expressed by a subset of primary sensory neurons and have been implicated in various pain states. Although recent studies suggest involvement of TTX-R Na+ channels in sensory synaptic transmission and spinal pain processing, it remains unknown whether TTX-R Na+ channels are expressed and function presynaptically. We examined expression of TTX-R channels at sensory synapses formed between rat dorsal root ganglion (DRG) and spinal cord (SC) neurons in a DRG/SC co-culture system. Immunostaining showed extensive labeling of presynaptic axonal boutons with Na(v)1.8- and Na(v)1.9-specific antibodies. Measurements using the fluorescent Na+ indicator SBFI demonstrated action potential-induced presynaptic Na+ entry that was resistant to tetrodotoxin (TTX) but was blocked by lidocaine. Furthermore, presynaptic [Ca2+](i) elevation in response to a single action potential was not affected by TTX in TTX-resistant DRG neurons. Finally, glutamatergic synaptic transmission was not inhibited by TTX in more than 50% of synaptic pairs examined; subsequent treatment with lidocaine completely blocked these TTX-resistant excitatory postsynaptic currents. Taken together, these results provide evidence for presynaptic expression of functional TTX-R Na+ channels that may be important for shaping presynaptic action potentials and regulating transmitter release at the first sensory synapse. (C) 2009 IBRO. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据