4.5 Article

Purkinje cell subtype specification in the cerebellar Cortex: Early B-cell factor 2 acts to repress the Zebrin II-positive purkinje cell phenotype

期刊

NEUROSCIENCE
卷 153, 期 3, 页码 721-732

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2008.01.090

关键词

zebrin II; Ebf2; Purkinje cell; pattern formation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The mammalian cerebellar cortex is highly compartmentalized. First, it is subdivided into four transverse expression domains: the anterior zone (AZ), the central zone (CZ), the posterior zone (PZ), and the nodular zone (NZ). Within each zone, the cortex is further subdivided into a symmetrical array of parasagittal stripes. The most extensively studied compartmentation antigen is zebrin II/aldolase c, which is expressed by a subset of Purkinje cells forming parasagittal stripes. Stripe phenotypes are specified early in cerebellar development, in part through the action of early B-cell factor 2 (Ebf2), a member of the atypical helix-loop-helix transcription factor family Collier/Olf1/EBF. In the murine cerebellum, Ebf2 expression is restricted to the zebrin II-immunonegative (zebrin II-) Purkinje cell population. We have identified multiple cerebellar defects in the Ebf2 null mouse involving a combination of selective Purkinje cell death and ectopic expression of multiple genes normally restricted to the zebrin II- subset. The nature of the cerebellar defect in the Ebf2 null is different in each transverse zone. In contrast to the ectopic expression of genes characteristic of the zebrin II+ Purkinje cell phenotype, phospholipase C beta 4 expression, restricted to zebrin II- Purkinje cells in control mice, is well maintained, and the normal number of stripes is present. Taken together, these data suggest that Ebf2 regulates the expression of genes associated with the zebrin II+ Purkinje cell phenotype and that the zebrin II- Purkinje cell subtype is specified independently. (c) 2008 IBRO. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据