4.2 Article

Olfactory Dysfunction, Gambling Task Performance and Intracranial Lesions After Traumatic Brain Injury

期刊

NEUROPSYCHOLOGY
卷 24, 期 4, 页码 504-513

出版社

AMER PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1037/a0018934

关键词

neuropsychology; frontal lesions; anosmia; Iowa Gambling Task; MRI

资金

  1. South-Eastern Norway Regional Health Authority

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To estimate the incidence of olfactory dysfunction across traumatic brain injury (TBI) severity and decision-making deficits with regard to intracranial lesions' location and laterality. Method: A 1-year prospective study including 115 participants (16-55 years) with mild, moderate, and severe TBI. The Brief Smell Identification Test was used 3 months postinjury with a follow-up testing of olfactory dysfunction at I year. The Iowa Gambling Task (IGT) and 3 tasks of the Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System were administered 3-months postinjury. MRI was performed 1-year postinjury and TBI severity groups were then divided with respect to frontal, fronto-temporal, diffuse, and no lesions. Results: The incidence of olfactory dysfunction was estimated to be 22.3% at 3 months and 13.5% at I year. No significant differences were found on olfactory dysfunction across TBI severity at either check. Anosmia was identified in 10% with severe TBI and 3% with mild TBI. Olfactory dysfunction was associated with verbal fluency tasks. Repeated-measures analysis of variance revealed no significant effect over blocks on IGT, and no main group or interaction effects regarding TBI severity, lesions' location, or laterality. IGT performance at 3-months postinjury was deficient in 83% of persons with intracranial lesions and 71% of those without lesions. Conclusions: Olfactory dysfunction is independent of TBI severity, showing improvements in one third of cases from 3- to 12-months postinjury. However. anosmia was related to TBI severity. There is evidence for marked decision-making deficits after TBI, all subgroups performed similarly and failed to develop an advantageous strategy over time.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据