4.3 Article

Analysis of a Promoter Polymorphism in the SMDF Neuregulin 1 Isoform in Schizophrenia

期刊

NEUROPSYCHOBIOLOGY
卷 59, 期 4, 页码 205-212

出版社

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000223732

关键词

Bipolar disorder; Neuregulin; NRG1; rs725588; Schizophrenia; SMDF

资金

  1. IGA MZ CR [NR8564]
  2. National Institute of Mental Health [R01MH073164]
  3. Juvenile Bipolar Research Foundation
  4. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH [R01MH073164] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background/Aims: Neuregulin 1 (NRG1) is a positional candidate gene in schizophrenia (SZ). Two major susceptibility loci in the NRG1 gene approximately one million nucleotides apart have been identified in genetic studies. Several candidate functional allelic variants have been described that might be involved in disease susceptibility. However, the findings are still preliminary. We recently mapped active promoters and other regulatory domains in several SZ and bipolar disorder (BD) candidate genes using ChIP-chip (chromatin immunoprecipitation hybridized to microarrays). One was the promoter for the NRG1 isoform, SMDF, which maps to the 3' end of the gene complex. Analysis of the SNP database revealed several polymorphisms within the approximate borders of the region immunoprecipitated in our ChIP-chip experiments, one of which is rs7825588. Methods: This SNP was analyzed in patients with SZ and BD and its effect on promoter function was assessed by electromobility gel shift assays and luciferase reporter constructs. Results: A significant increase in homozygosity for the minor allele was found in patients with SZ (genotype distribution chi(2) = 7.32, p = 0.03) but not in BD (genotype distribution chi(2) = 0.52, p = 0.77). Molecular studies demonstrated modest, but statistically significant allele-specific differences in protein binding and promoter function. Conclusion: The findings suggest that homozygosity for rs725588 could be a risk genotype for SZ. Copyright (C) 2009 S. Karger AG, Basel

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据