4.7 Article

Riluzole produces distinct anxiolytic-like effects in rats without the adverse effects associated with benzodiazepines

期刊

NEUROPHARMACOLOGY
卷 62, 期 8, 页码 2489-2498

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2012.02.012

关键词

Glutamate; Veratrine; GABA; Behavioral; Elevated plus-maze

资金

  1. Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare
  2. Japan Foundation for Neuroscience and Mental Health

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, we investigated the anxiolytic-like effect of riluzole using three different innate anxiety models in rats. In the elevated plus-maze test, riluzole significantly increased the time spent in, and entries into, the open arm after 60 min administration. This finding was supported by results obtained from light/dark and open-field tests. The magnitude of the anxiolytic-like effects of riluzole in each of the behavioral models was similar to those produced by a benzodiazepine, diazepam, suggesting that riluzole has a robust anxiolytic-like activity in rats. To clarify the involvement of sodium channels in this anxiolytic activity, we examined the effect of a co-administered sodium channel activator, veratrine. The anxiolytic-like action of riluzole was diminished by veratrine in the elevated plus-maze, light/dark and open-field tests. Based on these results, it is suggested that the anxiolytic mechanism of riluzole is clearly distinct from that of diazepam. In addition, to examine whether riluzole directly and non-selectively affected the GABA(A)-benzodiazepine receptor complex, we performed three behavioral tests (footprint analysis, Y-maze test and the ethanol-induced sleeping time test) that are closely related to the GABA(A)-benzodiazepine pathways. In contrast to diazepam, riluzole produced no significant effects in these tests. Here, we provide the first report demonstrating that riluzole produces distinct anxiolytic-like effects in rats without the adverse effects associated with benzodiazepines. Crown Copyright (C) 2012 Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据