4.7 Article

Mixed antagonistic effects of the ginkgolides at recombinant human ρ1 GABAC receptors

期刊

NEUROPHARMACOLOGY
卷 63, 期 6, 页码 1127-1139

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2012.06.067

关键词

Ginkgolide; Bilobalide; Mixed-antagonism; Use-dependent; GABA rho receptor; GABA(C) receptor; rho(1) GABA(C) receptor; Xenopus oocytes

资金

  1. National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia [352473]
  2. Wellcome Trust
  3. European Union [HEALTH-F2-2007-202088]
  4. University of Sydney

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The diterpene lactones of Ginkgo biloba, ginkgolides A. B and C are antagonists at a range of Cys-loop receptors. This study examined the effects of the ginkgolides at recombinant human rho(1) GABA(C) receptors expressed in Xenopus oocytes using two-electrode voltage clamp. The ginkgolides were moderately potent antagonists with IC(50)s in the AM range. At 10 mu M, 30 mu M and 100 mu M, the ginkgolides caused rightward shifts of GABA dose response curves and reduced maximal GABA responses, characteristic of noncompetitive antagonists, while the potencies showed a clear dependence on GABA concentration, indicating apparent competitive antagonism. This suggests that the ginkgolides exert a mixed-type antagonism at the rho(1) GABA(C) receptors. The ginkgolides did not exhibit any obvious use-dependent inhibition. Fitting of the data to a number of kinetic schemes suggests an allosteric inhibition as a possible mechanism of action of the ginkgolides which accounts for their inhibition of the responses without channel block or use-dependent inhibition. Kinetic modelling predicts that the ginkgolides exhibit saturation of antagonism at high concentrations of GABA, but this was only partially observed for ginkgolide B. It also suggests that there may be different binding sites in the closed and open states of the receptor, with a higher affinity for the receptor in the closed state. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据