4.7 Article

NMDA receptor-mediated long-term alterations in epileptiform activity in experimental chronic epilepsy

期刊

NEUROPHARMACOLOGY
卷 56, 期 2, 页码 414-421

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2008.09.009

关键词

Kainate; Hippocampus; Depotentiation; Seizures

资金

  1. NINDS NIH HHS [R01 NS034360-07, R01 NS034360-09, R01 NS034360-05, R01 NS034360, R01 NS034360-05S1, R01 NS034360-04, R01 NS034360-10, R01 NS034360-08, R01 NS034360-03, R01 NS034360-12, R01 NS034360-06, R01 NS034360-11, R01 NS034360-13] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

When epileptiform activity is acutely induced in vitro, transient partial blockade of N-methyl-D-aspartic acid (NMDA) receptor-mediated calcium influx leads to selective long-term depotentiation of the synapses involved in the epileptic activity as well as a reduction in the probability of further epileptiform activity. If such selective depotentiation occurred within foci of epileptic activity in vivo, the corresponding long-term reduction in seizure probability could form the basis for a novel treatment of epilepsy. Continuous radiotelemetric EEG monitoring demonstrated modest acute anticonvulsant effects but no long-term reductions in the probability of spontaneous seizures after transient partial blockade of NMDA receptors (NMDAR) during ictal and interictal activity in the kainate animal model of chronic epilepsy. In vitro, depotentiation was induced when NMDAR were partially blocked during epileptiform activity in hippocampal slices from control animals, but not in slices from chronically epileptic rats. However in slices from epileptic animals, depotentiation during epileptiform activity was induced by partial block of NMDAR using NR2B- but not NR2A-selective antagonists. These results suggest that chronic epileptic activity is associated with changes in NMDA receptor-mediated signaling that is reflected in the pharmacology of activity- and NMDA receptor-dependent depotentiation. (c) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据