4.0 Article

The glia-derived extracellular matrix glycoprotein tenascin-C promotes embryonic and postnatal retina axon outgrowth via the alternatively spliced fibronectin type III domain TNfnD

期刊

NEURON GLIA BIOLOGY
卷 4, 期 -, 页码 271-283

出版社

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S1740925X09990020

关键词

Extracellular matrix; neuron-glia interactions; retinal explant; tenascin-gene family; axon guidance by glia

资金

  1. German Research Council (DFG) [SFB 5og/TP A10]
  2. German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Tenascin-C (Tn c) is an astrocytic multifunctional extra cellular matrix (ECM) glycoprotein that potentially promotes or inhibits neurite outgrowth. To investigate its possible functions for retinal development, explants from embryonic day 18 (E18) rat retinas were cultivated on culture substrates composed of poly-D-lysine (PDL), or PDL additionally coated with Tnc or laminin (LN)-1, which significantly increased fiber length. When combined with LN, Tnc induced axon fasciculation that reduced the apparent number of outgrowing fibers. In order to circumscribe the stimulatory region, Tnc-derived fibronectin type III (TNfn) domains fused to the human Ig-Fc-fragment TNfnD6-Fc, TNfnBD-Fc, TNFnA,A,-Fc and TNfnA(1)A(2)-Fc were studied. The fusion proteins TNfnBD-Fc and to a lesser degree TNfnA(1)D-Fc were stimulatory when compared with the Ig-Fcfragment protein without insert. In contrast, the combination TNfnA(1)A(2)-Fc reduced fiber outgrowth beneath the values obtained for the 1g-Fc domain, indicating potential inhibitory properties. The monoclonal J1/tn2 antibody (clone 578) that is specific for domain TNfnD blocked the stimulatory properties of the TNfn-Fc fusions. When postnatal day 7 retinal ganglion cells were used rather that explants, The and Tnc-derived proteins proved permissive for neurite outgrowth. The present study highlights a strong retinal axon growth-promoting activity of the Tnc domain TNfnD, which is modulated by neighboring domains.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据