4.8 Article

Restricting Temptations: Neural Mechanisms of Precommitment

期刊

NEURON
卷 79, 期 2, 页码 391-401

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.05.028

关键词

-

资金

  1. Sir Henry Wellcome Postdoctoral Fellowship
  2. VENI grant from the Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (NWO) [016.081.144]
  3. Amsterdam graduate school for the neurosciences (ONWA)
  4. University Research Fellowship of the Royal Society [UF080591]
  5. Swiss National Science Foundation [PP00P1_128574, CRSII3_141965]
  6. Medical Research Council [G00001354]
  7. Wellcome Trust [G00001354]
  8. Medical Research Council [G1000183B, G0001354, G1000183, G0001354B] Funding Source: researchfish
  9. Royal Society [UF080591] Funding Source: Royal Society
  10. MRC [G1000183] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Humans can resist temptations by exerting willpower, the effortful inhibition of impulses. But willpower can be disrupted by emotions and depleted over time. Luckily, humans can deploy alternative self-control strategies like precommitment, the voluntary restriction of access to temptations. Here, we examined the neural mechanisms of willpower and precommitment using fMRI. Behaviorally, precommitment facilitated choices for large delayed rewards, relative to willpower, especially in more impulsive individuals. While willpower was associated with activation in dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), posterior parietal cortex (PPC), and inferior frontal gyrus, precommitment engaged lateral frontopolar cortex (LFPC). During precommitment, LFPC showed increased functional connectivity with DLPFC and PPC, especially in more impulsive individuals, and the relationship between impulsivity and LFPC connectivity was mediated by value-related activation in ventromedial PFC. Our findings support a hierarchical model of self-control in which LFPC orchestrates precommitment by controlling action plans in more caudal prefrontal regions as a function of expected value.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据