4.7 Article

A retrospective review of X-linked Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease in childhood

期刊

NEUROLOGY
卷 76, 期 5, 页码 461-466

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e31820a0ceb

关键词

-

资金

  1. PTC Therapeutics, Inc.

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: X-linked Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease (CMTX) is infrequently diagnosed in childhood, and its clinical and neurophysiologic features are not well-described. We reviewed clinical, neurophysiologic, and pathologic findings in 17 children with CMTX. Methods: This was a retrospective review of children with CMTX from 2 tertiary pediatric hospitals. The diagnosis of CMTX was based on an identifiable connexin 32 mutation (CMTX1) or a consistent pedigree and neurophysiologic features in children without a connexin 32 mutation (CMTX-other). Results: Six boys and 2 girls from 8 kindreds had CMTX1, and 8 boys and 1 girl from 5 kindreds had other forms of CMTX (CMTX-other). Fifteen children, including males and carrier females, were symptomatic from infancy or early childhood (younger than 5 years). In addition to the typical Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease clinical phenotype, some patients had delayed motor development, sensorineural hearing loss, tremor, pathologic fractures, or transient CNS disturbances. Eleven children underwent nerve conduction studies. Median nerve motor nerve conduction velocities were in the intermediate to normal range (30-54 m/s) in all children older than 2 years. Axon loss, reflected by low-amplitude compound muscle action potentials, was present in all patients. A pattern of X-linked dominant inheritance, with carrier females showing an abnormal neurologic or neurophysiologic examination, correlated with the presence of a connexin 32 mutation in all but 2 pedigrees. Conclusions: The clinical phenotype of CMTX is broader than previously reported. Onset in males and carrier females is most often in early childhood. Families with an X-linked dominant inheritance pattern are likely to have CMTX1. Neurology (R) 2011;76:461-466

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据